|
||||||||||||||
Thursday, 16 December 2004
In a speech to the National Endowment for Democracy on November 6, 2003, President Bush stated, Sixty years of Western nations excusing and accommodating the lack of freedom in the Middle East did nothing to make us safe - because in the long run, stability cannot be purchased at the expense of liberty. But while the administration appears earnest about promoting democracy in Iraq it has made little progress - in fact it has even regressed - in promoting democracy among Americas southern neighbors. While its relationship with most of Latin America has centered exclusively on trade agreements and, to a lesser extent, drugs and terrorism, its hardline anti-Aristide policy has led to overturning the same democratic principles it claims to be espousing in Baghdad. Indeed, in Port-au-Prince, the Bush administration has shown that it strongly believes stability can only be purchased at the expense of liberty. In a stunning reversal of the administrations pre-coup Haiti policy, Secretary of State Colin Powell went from denouncing the opposition as a gang of thugs to maintaining that Aristide had to reach political agreement with some of its elements. Powells flip-flop signaled the end of the constitutional government, since it then became clear to the opposition that the US would not hinder its openly stated strategy of non-negotiation with Aristide. Regarding Kofi Annan, he comes to Washington today struggling to hold on to his job which is at risk over his sons involvement in the Iraq oil-for-food scandal. To strengthen his position as Secretary-General of the United Nations, he will be prepared to make many concessions. One of the items of discussion with Secretary of State Powell will be the UNs role in Haiti. Annan has, so far, been utterly compliant with the Bush administrations efforts to marginalize ousted President Jean-Bertrand Aristide. In the days preceding the February 29, 2004 de-facto ouster of Aristide and his U.S. arranged flight into exile, Annan echoed U.S. policy in condemning Aristide as Haitis failed president and Powells cynical scenario that international peacekeepers would be sent to Haiti, but only if Aristide abrogated most of his constitutionally mandated authority. Annans backing of Powells strategy legitimated Washingtons goal of ridding itself of Aristide. At todays talks, a politically weakened Annan is likely to discuss next years Haiti elections and how to minimize a role for the pro-Aristide Lavalas party. Dark Days for Lavalas Prior to the coup, the opposition groups - mainly the Group of 184 and the Democratic Convergence - refused to negotiate with Aristide. At the time, Democratic Convergence leader Evans Paul stated, We are willing to negotiate through which door [President Aristide] leaves the palace, through the front door or the back door. We have yet to see if Latortue will formally ban the Lavalas party: however, current trends suggest that the interim government will continue to tolerate extra-constitutional paramilitary units, such as members of the former army disbanded by Aristide, to repress Lavalas supporters both in their neighborhoods and at the polls. Ultimately, he may move to incorporate the ex-military into a still-to-be reconstituted armed force. UN Legitimacy at Risk Currently the UN force, led by General Augusto Heleno of Brazil, is highly prejudiced in the use of its power. Far from abiding by the impartial language of the mandate to support the constitutional and political processes under way in Haiti . . . and foster principles and democratic governance and institutional development, MINUSTAH continually sides with the inherently lawless Haitian police during the latters repeated raids on Aristide supporters, and with a Justice Minister who has no regard for due process. As described by Chief of Mission of the Haiti embassy in Washington, Raymond A. Joseph, to COHA, a situation of war exists in Haiti. In war a lot of things are not quite legal, but you have to take measures to protect yourself. But often these measures go much too far. As reported by the Haiti Accompaniment Project, a coalition of US-based organizations devoted to documenting human rights violations in Haiti, in the lead up to the February 2004 coup and immediately afterwards, there were large-scale killings and the systematic burning of the homes of people identified as members or supporters of Fanmi Lavalas. The cities of Petit Goave, Gonaives, and Cap-Haitian have been particularly hit hard by the violence. For MINUSTAH to be perceived as a legitimate peacekeeping force, General Heleno must address the egregious human rights abuses perpetrated daily by the rebel gangs and anti-Aristide factions, as well as those by pro-Aristide vigilantes. Haitians, the majority of whom supported Aristide (in the elections of 1990 and 2000 he won two thirds of the vote), will never view the UN force as anything but the international wing of Latortues oppressive regime until it metes out justice impartially, regardless of ones suspected party affiliation. The second task of the UN is to put much more pressure on Latortue and his rogue Justice Minister Bernard Gousse to release political prisoners and respect due process. This action would satisfy a necessary, but by no means sufficient, condition for the upcoming elections. Nevertheless, the situation looks grim for the inclusion of the majority Lavalas party in next years elections. As noted by the Haiti Accompaniment project, Fanmi Lavalas has experienced the brunt of repression since the coup. Many leaders have left the country or are in internal exile. Many Lavalas members and supporters have had their homes burned, have lost jobs, and have been separated from their families. MINUSTAH must be as diligent in protecting pro-Lavalas groups and human rights organizations, like the Aristide Foundation for Democracy, Lafanmi Selavi and the Coordination des Femmes Victimes dHaiti (COFEVIH), as it gives the appearance of slavishly acting as Latortues hit squad. Perhaps a constructive first step in this direction would be replacing General Heleno, who has displayed neither particular competence in the field nor sufficient diplomatic tact, as head of MINUSTAH mission. Latortues Stooge This analysis was prepared by COHA Senior Research Fellow, Seth R. DeLong, Ph.D. Recent COHA Reports on Haiti For Nuclear Brazil, Its Good to Have Friends in High Places Secrecy shrouding Brazils nuclear capabilities, suspected technological advances and provocative statements made by Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva during his presidential campaign alarmed U.S. nuclear control advocates. But, according to Secretary of State Colin Powell, future nuclear weapons proliferation by Brasilia no longer is a distinct possibility. Could Haiti be the missing ingredient? - Dec 14 Haitis Ship Sails on Without a Captain and With a Very Disreputable Crew: Kofi Annan, Roger Noriega, Colin Powell and Lula of Brazil have much to answer for failing to implement the UNs Stabilization Mission - Dec 9 Brazils Peacekeeping Mission in Haiti: Doing Gods or Washingtons Work? -Dec 6 Powell Returns to Haiti Today to Witness Some of the Damage that His Policies Have Wrought - Dec 1 Condoleezza Rice In, Colin Powell Out: HAITI: A Brutal Regime Shows Its Colors Violence in Haiti: Colin Powell and Gerard Latortue Blame Aristide, when the Blame Lies With Them - Oct 13 |
||||||||||||||